[A2k] Open letter
Bernard.Lang at datcha.net
Wed Feb 16 17:13:16 PST 2011
What is this open letter you are talking about. I do not find it in
earlier post. Maybe I did not read the relevant one.
* Silke Helfrich <Silke.Helfrich at gmx.de>, le 15-02-11, a écrit:
> Dear Richard,
> we take this into account for the next initiave, but the letter as
> proposed was actually shared with the communication networks last week
> in Dakar, therefor we stick to that version. (We will now publish it
> with the signatures of those who signed it and circulate it for
> distribution and further signatures)
> The letter is written in a way, that those how receive it and media can
> clearly understand what it is all about.
> Very best
> On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 11:15 -0500, Richard Stallman wrote:
> > The FSF mostly agrees with the views expressed in the letter, but
> > cannot sign it, because of its use of the term "intellectual property"
> > as if that referred to something coherent. The letter goes so far as
> > to treat "intellectual property" as a kind of substance.
> > It is a mistake to generalize about copyright law and patent law. It
> > is a worse mistake to generalize about a dozen totally different laws.
> > The reference to an attempt to "balance" the system for handling this
> > fictitious substance is also an obstacle. Even in regard to copyright
> > alone, "balance" as usually interpreted is the wrong goal. (See
> > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/misinterpreting-copyright.html. That
> > article's argument based on the US Constitution would carry no weight
> > for Brazil, but I think its conclusion is valid anyway.)
> > The use of the word "protect" to describe what copyright does is also
> > unfortunate. That alone would not be a reason to reject the letter,
> > but it's so easy to avoid -- why not avoid it?
> > I suppose it is too late now to change the wording of this letter.
> > However, you may in the future write other texts that you'd like the
> > FSF to support. These same issues are likely to arise each time,
> > so you may as well know about them in advance.
> > The FSF is limited to the issue of free software and its sub-issues.
> > Some issues about the sharing of other kinds of works don't raise the
> > issue of free software, so the FSF would have to stay out of them.
> > However, this letter's issue does affect free software concerns, which
> > would have given the FSF a basis to support it ... if only the text
> > had been written differently.
> A2k mailing list
> A2k at lists.keionline.org
Après la bulle Internet, la bulle financière ...
Et bientôt la bulle des brevets
la gestion des catastrophes comme principe de gouvernement
Bernard.Lang at datcha.net ,_ /\o \o/ gsm +33 6 6206 1693
http://www.datcha.net/ ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ tel +33 1 3056 1693
Je n'exprime que mon opinion - I express only my opinion
CAGED BEHIND WINDOWS or FREE WITH LINUX
More information about the A2k