[A2k] INTA committee amendments to draft opinion on ACTA
ante at ffii.org
Tue Jun 12 08:05:32 PDT 2012
INTA committee amendments to draft opinion on ACTA
June 12, 2012
In its 20-21 June session, the European Parliament International Trade
committee will vote on David Martin’s draft opinion on ACTA. The draft opinion
recommends to Parliament to reject ACTA (“Declines to consent to conclusion of
Members of the committee tabled three amendments changing the recommendation.
Two amendments, by Godelieve Quisthoudt-Rowohl (EPP) and Christofer Fjellner
(EPP) change the recommendation to “Consents to conclusion of the agreement”.
The Justification added to Christofer Fjellner’s amendment is
incomprehensible. Before the vote, the Commission and Member States should
give guarantees to ensure legal clarity. This is impossible, such guarantees
are not binding, and also depend on other countries party to ACTA and external
dispute resolution panels. Mr Fjellner wants ACTA adopted with fake
Mr Fjellner’s justification:
“Europe needs an international agreement to step up the fight against
counterfeit products. The ACTA agreement provides a useful basis to this fight
against counterfeit products and ensures an adequate protection of consumers
and companies alike.
On the other hand there is a need for legal clarity regarding certain
provisions in the agreement in respect of its digital chapter. It is important
that ACTA is not open to any interpretation that would infringe EU law. We
need to ensure legal clarity when it comes to internet service providers’
responsibility under ACTA and to add legal clarity as to when Member states
could impose criminal enforcement measures on internet users.
Therefore we call on the European Commission and Member States to ensure
that ACTA does not open up for any interpretation that would infringe EU law.
Such guarantees have to be given before the European Parliament can give its
consent to the Agreement.”
The third amendment, by Syed Kamall (ECR) proposes to suspend the vote:
“Decides to suspend the vote on consent to the draft Council decision; the
decision on whether to consent to or reject the agreement will be reviewed
once the European Parliament is in a position to take into account the opinion
of the European Court of Justice on the compatibility of the Anti-
Counterfeiting Trade Agreement with the Treaties”.
That would be a disservice to democracy. The Court will only marginally test
ACTA. The Parliament should take a political decision now.
The Parliament’s plenary vote may take place the 3th of July.
Committee homepage, stream will be published here | Agenda will be published
More information about the A2k