[Ip-health] Los Angeles Times: FDA is blocked from requiring graphic warnings on cigarette labels

Outterson, Kevin mko at bu.edu
Tue Nov 8 06:28:33 PST 2011

Actually we should go there. As I said yesterday at TIE<http://theincidentaleconomist.com/wordpress/court-injunction-blocks-fda-graphic-warnings/>: "The Founding Fathers wouldn’t recognize today’s First Amendment, which was designed to protect religious and political minorities, but is increasingly defending the world’s most powerful corporations.  The First Amendment has become corporate America’s weapon of choice against public health rules."

Associate Professor
BU Law<http://www.bu.edu/law/faculty/profiles/#o> & BU SPH
Editor in Chief, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics<http://www.aslme.org/Publications>
Faculty Associate, Harvard Center for Communicable Disease Dynamics<http://ccdd.hsph.harvard.edu/about/Faculty-Outside-Harvard/Michael-Outterson>
Blogging health law at The Incidental Economist<http://www.theincidentaleconomist.com>
Research papers at SSRN<http://ssrn.com/author=340746>

On Nov 8, 2011, at 9:16 AM, Riaz K Tayob wrote:

And let us not even go into whether this is GATS compatible or a
violation of intellectual property rights (trademarks etc) under
investment agreements...

On 2011/11/08 03:41 PM, Rachel Kiddell-Monroe wrote:
oh no.... tobacco have some good lawyers...

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 4:11 AM, Thirukumaran Balasubramaniam<
thiru at keionline.org<mailto:thiru at keionline.org>>  wrote:


By Alexa Vaughn, Los Angeles Times

Ip-health mailing list
Ip-health at lists.keionline.org<mailto:Ip-health at lists.keionline.org>

More information about the Ip-health mailing list