[Ip-health] Infojustice Roundup - November 26, 2012

Michael Palmedo mpalmedo at wcl.american.edu
Mon Nov 26 12:59:25 PST 2012

Infojustice Roundup 


Philippines Copyright Legislation Clears Conference Committee


[Mike Palmedo] Legislation making a number of changes to the
Philippines' Republic Act 8293 (the Intellectual Property Code) has
cleared the conference committee.  The law makes a number of changes
aimed at strengthening IP protection, but it also adds a specific
copyright exception for the visually impaired.  Sen. Manny Villar,
Chairman of the Committee on Trade and Commerce and the Senate bill's
sponsor, stressed that the stronger protection is need for copyright
industries in the Philippines, which account for 5% of the country's
GDP. Click here for more. <http://infojustice.org/archives/27824> 


Access Victories and the Global Kaletra Campaign


[Stephanie Rosenberg] November 10, 2012 marked the first anniversary of
the global Kaletra campaign, a campaign comprising health groups in 12
countries challenging pharmaceutical monopolies including Abbott
Laboratories' hold on HIV/AIDS treatment Kaletra and its components
lopinavir and ritonavir. These groups have taken actions through
compulsory license requests, patent oppositions, litigation and public
campaigning to promote generic competition and lower costs. Several new
significant victories have been achieved.  For example, Indonesia issued
licenses for seven medicines treating hepatitis B and HIV (including
lopinavir+ritonavir). Ecuador issued a second compulsory license for an
ARV treatment. A Colombian appellate court ruled that the Ministry of
Health violated collective rights to health by failing to require Abbott
to comply with the reference price for Kaletra (the Ministry has since
imposed this requirement, reducing Kaletra prices by 70%) and must
maintain Kaletra on a parallel imports list. Click here for more.


Pirates are the Best Customers: Anatomy of a Ridiculous Controversy


[Joe Karaganis] Some weeks ago, we published a lengthy blog post called
Where do Music Collections Come From?  which discussed findings from our
Copy Culture survey. Some of the data demonstrated that P2P file sharers
(who own digital music files) buy more music than their non-P2P using
peers (who also own digital music files). To me, this was a fairly
innocuous finding, well in line with other studies.  For my money, the
more important findings were that personal sharing 'between friends' is
about as prevalent and as significant in music acquisition as
'downloading for free', and that together they are outweighed by legal
acquisition. But the public spoke and the P2P finding went viral: the
biggest pirates are the best customers.   Headlines like this generated
pushback from record industry groups RIAA and IFPI-mostly centered
around the work of NPD, their survey firm in the US.  The exchange, I
think, is an interesting window on the state of the empirical debate
around file sharing. Click here for more.


Canadian Parliament to Vote on Amendments to Law on Export of Medicines
Produced Under Compulsory License


[Mike Palmedo] On Wednesday, the Canadian Parliament will vote on Bill
C-398, legislation to reform the Canada's Access to Medicines Regime
(CAMR).  This is the law that was passed in 2004 to allow generic firms
in Canada to export medicines produced under compulsory license to
developing countries.  CAMR establishes a framework that complies with
the WTO's  amendments to the TRIPS Agreement regarding compulsory
licenses for drugs not meant primarily for domestic markets. However,
the framework has proved too cumbersome for practical application - only
one shipment of drugs has ever resulted from a generic firm using the
CAMR system.Click here for more. <http://infojustice.org/archives/27963>


WIPO Committee Finishes A Step Closer To Treaty For Visually Impaired 


[Catherine Saez, IP Watch] After a long week of discussions, delegates
at the World Intellectual Property Organization last night adopted a
working draft text that could become a treaty or other instrument
providing copyright exceptions for visually impaired people, and agreed
to send the text to the WIPO extraordinary General Assembly next month.
Country delegates and visually impaired representatives hailed a
constructive atmosphere and progress achieved this week, but a number of
delegations highlighted the fact that much more work will be needed to
reach final agreement on remaining outstanding issues. Click here for
the full story on ip-watch.org.


The Model BIT: A Framework for Intellectual Property Agreements


[Matt Webb] The success of the Model Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT)
process in advancing transparency in the investment policy-making at the
international level provides a practical and achievable framework for
other areas on trade.  Though far from perfect, the Model BIT has
improved transparency for the highly controversial area of investment,
while still allowing the US to successfully negotiate a multitude of
BITs and investment chapters. Because trade policies involving
intellectual property rights (IPR) are also very controversial, the
Model BIT framework could be used to create model IPR Agreements and
chapters to increase the legitimacy of international policy making in
this area. Click here for more. <http://infojustice.org/archives/27837> 





More information about the Ip-health mailing list