[Ip-health] Drug prices too high? Many blame pharma companies

Tahir Amin tahir at i-mak.org
Tue Jun 16 15:09:40 PDT 2015


http://www.cnbc.com/id/102760544

 Drug companies are going to need to take an aspirin—or three—after reading
this.

A new poll
<http://kff.org/health-costs/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-june-2015>
finds that most Americans see drug prices as being unreasonably high—and
that people are far more likely to blame drug makers than they are to point
the finger at health insurance companies.

A total of 73 percent of respondents to the Kaiser Health Tracking Poll
said medication costs too much. And 76 percent of those people said that's
because pharmaceutical companies set prices too high, according to the
survey
<http://kff.org/health-costs/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-june-2015>
released Tuesday.

Just 10 percent said the prices are too high because insurers require
people to directly pay an excessive share of the cost of their prescription
drugs under their health plans.

The same percentage said that both insurers and drug companies are to blame
for this state of affairs.

The findings come two months after another Kaiser poll
<http://kff.org/health-costs/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-april-2015/>
found that the public was more concerned about drug-related costs than
about other health issues, including Obamacare. In that survey
<http://kff.org/health-costs/poll-finding/kaiser-health-tracking-poll-april-2015/>,
76 percent said a top priority for the president and Congress should be to
make sure that that high-cost drugs for chronic conditions are affordable
to patients who use them, and that the government should take action to
lower the prices of prescription drugs.

In the latest poll by Kaiser, a whopping 87 percent said they favored
giving the federal government's Medicare program, which provides health
care to the elderly, the ability to negotiate drug prices with
manufacturers, a power Medicare now lacks.

Drug prices are "clearly on people's mind," said Mollyann Brodie, who is in
charge of polling for the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Brodie said that isn't surprising, given the fact that half of the 1,200
people polled by Kaiser currently take prescription medicine. The poll had
a margin of error of +/-3 percent.

"The thing about prescription drugs is it's the most tangible and frequent
way a person interacts with the health-care system," said Brodie.

While most people surveyed in the latest poll (76 percent) said they could
easily afford their medication, 21 percent said it was difficult to foot
the bill. And 1 in 4 people currently taking prescription drugs have not
filled a prescription in the past years as a result of cost, the poll
found.

Drug costs have received widespread attention in recent years with the
introduction of high-priced specialty medicines such as Gilead Sciences'
<http://data.cnbc.com/quotes/GILD> hepatitis C drug Sovaldi, which costs
$84,000 for a 12-week treatment.

Last week, Avalere Health released an analysis
<http://www.cnbc.com/id/102741309> projecting that 10 "breakthrough" drugs
in the pipeline now will by themselves cost the federal government $50
billion over the next decade.

The insurance trade group, America's Health Insurance Plans, sponsored that
research. AHIP has been engaged in a concerted public relations battle with
drug companies over drug prices, which AHIP blames for increased insurance
costs.

In reaction to the Kaiser poll released Thursday, AHIP spokeswoman Clare
Krusing said, "Americans are growing increasingly frustrated by high drug
prices that are relentlessly driving up premiums and out-of-pocket costs.
Drug makers need to get the message."

"We've hit an inflection point, where there have been year-over-year price
increases, and what that is leading to is, I think, is a very serious issue
about access and affordability," Krusing said.

Read MoreLinking cancer drug prices to their performance
<http://www.cnbc.com/id/102711077>

If drug prices continue rising as they have been, it will become more
difficult to ensure that patients who need certain medications get them,
Krusing said. She added, there should be "more transparency around
prescription drug pricing."

But Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America, which represents the country's leading
biopharmaceutical researchers and biotechnology companies, said the
questions that Kaiser asked respondents in its survey failed to provide
people with enough information on which to base their opinions, such as the
cost drug companies incur in developing a new drug.

Zirkelbach cited a Tufts University study
<http://cen.acs.org/articles/92/web/2014/11/Tufts-Study-Finds-Big-Rise.html>
that found the cost of developing a new drug had more than doubled, from
$1.2 billion in 2003 to $2.6 billion.

And he also noted how the design of a health plan by insurers can lead to
customers directly paying for a greater share of drug costs than they
previously did in the form of higher deductibles, co-payments and
co-payments.

"What we know and what the data show is that patients are getting asked to
pay an ever-greater share of their medicine costs," Zirkelbach said. "It's
no wonder that patients feel that their medicine costs are going up and
up."

"The trend we're seeing now goes too far," he said, referring to insurance
plans shifting the burden of costs more toward customers in higher
out-of-pocket limits.






-- 
Tahir Amin
Co-Founder and Director of Intellectual Property
Initiative for Medicines, Access & Knowledge (I-MAK)
*Website:* www.i-mak.org
*Email:* tahir at i-mak.org
*Skype: *tahirmamin
*Tel:* +1 917 455 6601/+44 771 853 9472



More information about the Ip-health mailing list