[Ip-health] Yet Another IP Fight Canada
jcormie at citizen.org
Thu Jun 21 08:39:17 PDT 2012
Dear Fellow Canadians:
Welcome to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations! Fresh off a bruising fight getting provisions that protect internet freedom and privacy into Canada's copyright Bill C-11<http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6544/125/>, I'm sure that you are exhausted with defending your rights. Take heart. With the TPP you will not have much of a say on laws or policies threatening your privacy, rights on the internet and access to affordable medicines. Instead, lobbyists from major American industries and some 600 "corporate trade advisers"<http://economyincrisis.org/content/trans-pacific-partnership-brought-to-you-by-lobbyists> have helped lay out some of what the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) expects from you.
These are the same industries that forced major concessions on C-11's approach to digital locks despite near-universal criticism. Hundreds of pages of new non-trade policy contained in the most sweeping "free trade agreement" could face a mere up or down vote in the House of Commons. And the USTR proposes intellectual property provisions that cover dramatically more than copyright law. They touch a wide range of IP issues.
You thought NAFTA was a pill? Sure, Big PhRMA used NAFTA to attack our drug formulary system and all of those compulsory licenses for affordable meds. But back then, our government drew a line. Despite some considerable hysteria from the U.S. drug industry giants, did not give away all of our policy space. This time, however, TPP gives PM Harper a way to write all of us a real prescription for high drug prices and cement his view of Canada as an extended playground for corporate America.
Here are some of the highlights <http://infojustice.org/archives/9508> of the US proposed IP chapter:
* Expand patent evergreening and create new pharmaceutical monopolies, raising medicine costs
* Dramatically increase the life of a copyright term from 50 years in most cases under C-11 to 95 years
* Increase penalties for circumvention and reduce the exceptions for
* Establish an American-style <https://www.eff.org/issues/dmca> notice-and-take down system for online copyright infringement
This seems like a lot. If you were worried, however, that we had some duty to at least read the proposals for the law and voice our democratic concern-fear not. Negotiators act in secret. The only glimpse of the actual agreement so far has come from leaked copies of the text from the IP<http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/TransPacificIP1.pdf>, Investment<http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/tppinvestment.pdf>, and other chapters. Remember in the good old days of ACTA when the University of Ottawa filed an access to information request but received a blacked out document with only the title? Expect similar treatment during TPP negotiations. While lobbyists and corporate liaisons are granted electronic access to the agreement, your parliamentary representative might have to walk down to the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade to speak personally with The Honourable David Johnston, Minister of International Trade.
Moreover, if you are distressed by the fact that our respectable Department of Trade will have lots of work reviewing all the work done so far once Canada's negotiators get hold of these secret drafts, you will be relieved to hear that Canada has a lesser role in the negotiations. By coming late to the table, Canada has achieved a 2nd tier position<http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/6547/125/>. This status requires Canada to agree to all the settled chapters, which they have not even read, and Canada cannot veto current provisions. Thus, not even lobbyists or the Trade Minister need concern themselves with settled provisions. The TPP negotiations shut individual citizens and even members of parliament and ministers out of the process.
The public response to C-11 proved that civil engagement has made a difference on intellectual property issues in Canada. The people, frustrated, fearful, and bedraggled, woke up to the oppressive measures of industry groups and fought hard. But this is far from the end. In upcoming years, we might still witness the implementation of a multinational corporations' wish list, which seeks to criminalize copyright infringement, implement ACTA-plus provisions, and restrict Canadians' access to affordable medicines. Through the TPP, USTR seeks to achieve all these goals and more-without too much of a voice from us. Will we allow American industry to dictate to the Canadian people our rights - or stand up and demand that Canada step down from these negotiations?
Follow GLOBAL ACCESS TO MEDICINES PROGRAM: @PCMedsAccess
James Cormie is a legal intern at Global Access to Medicines Program. Originally from Edmonton, Alberta, James blogs on issues of trade, IP, and international law.
More information about the Ip-health