[Ip-health] Oxfam statement on the current negotiation to extend TRIPS waiver for LDCs
mkamalyanni at Oxfam.org.uk
Wed Jun 5 15:06:12 PDT 2013
Oxfam statement on the position of the EU and US that hinders the request
of the Least Developed Countries for unconditional extension of the
transition period of TRIPS implementation
Oxfam strongly condemns the tough and inflexible stance of the US and EU
against the Least Developed Countries? (LDCs) request for a new transition
to implement the World Trade Organisation (WTO) intellectual property
rules (TRIPS agreement) in order to protect their development and health
The Chair of the TRIPS Council to the WTO is currently holding informal
consultations between developed countries and LDCs to negotiate the terms
of the extension to the current transition period (due to expire on 30th
June 2013). The LDCs have requested a transition period until a country
ceases to be an LDC but the developed countries want to limit the duration
period to less than 7.5 years. The US and the EU are also imposing a
condition that requires LDCs to maintain existing levels of TRIPS
compliance, even if these work against their development needs. These
conditionalities are not required by the TRIPS agreement itself.
A short transition would not allow LDCs to develop the basic prerequisites
(e.g. qualified personnel, a scientific and technological base, a
functioning market, and regulatory systems) that could enable them to
benefit from the TRIPS Agreement.
LDCs (most of which are in sub-Saharan Africa) are the most vulnerable
segment of the international community. More than half of the population
in LDCs live on less than $1.25 per day. Pressuring LDCs to implement
TRIPS before they acquire a viable technological base is counterproductive
to their efforts to combat poverty.
The early implementation of TRIPS agreement would also have a grave impact
on access to medical technologies, educational resources, seeds and
climate change adaptation technologies. This is why more than 300
associations around the world and the industry group representing Google,
Facebook and Microsoft (CCIA) are standing behind the LDCs proposal.
Instituting TRIPS-compliant IP systems would be very expensive for LDCs
(between $250,000 and $1 million, plus additional annual expenditures of
up to $1 million.)
There are more pressing development needs that should be addressed with
?It is totally unacceptable that the US and EU oppose the LDCs? request
for unconditional extension of the TRIPS waiver until a country ceases to
be an LDC. The LDCs should be enabled to choose an IP system suitable for
their development needs,? says Mohga Kamal-Yanni, senior health & HIV
policy advisor at Oxfam.
Oxfam urges the developed countries especially the US and EU to adopt a
more cooperative approach and secure a transition period that enables
LDCs, for as long as they remain so, to determine the level of IP
protection that best suits their development needs and goals.
We also urge the LDCs to not give in to pressure from the US and EU and to
stand firm by the legitimate demands they have made to the TRIPS Council.
Dr. Mohga M Kamal-Yanni
Senior health & HIV policy advisor
John Smith Drive, Oxford, OX4 2JY, UK
Tel: + 44 (0) 1865 472290
UK Mobile + 44 (0)777 62 55 884
Skype Mohga Kamal-Yanni
Follow me @MohgaKamalYanni
Oxfam works with others to overcome poverty and suffering.
Oxfam GB is a member of Oxfam International and a company limited by guarantee registered in England No. 612172.
Registered office: Oxfam House, John Smith Drive, Cowley, Oxford, OX4 2JY.
A registered charity in England and Wales (no 202918) and Scotland (SC 039042)
More information about the Ip-health